The divorce financial discovery checklist.
What to request, how to structure the requests, and how to keep the record of what never arrived. Written from forensic-accounting practice, maintained as the practice evolves.
The failure mode isn't what arrives. It's what quietly never does.
In a document-heavy divorce, the financial picture is assembled from hundreds of documents produced in batches over months. Nobody withholds the obvious things — the joint checking statements show up. What goes missing is quieter: the three statement periods around a large transfer, the K-1 from the entity nobody mentioned, the canceled checks that would show where the money actually went.
A production that is 90% complete looks complete. Unless someone is keeping score per account and per period, the missing 10% is invisible until a deposition — or never. The checklist below is the scorecard.
The document families to request.
These are the families that recur in practice — the same ones the standard 22 IOD categories are built around. Request them all in the first pass; narrowing later is easy, re-requesting is slow.
Request by account and period, not by pile.
"All bank statements" is a request that invites a partial response. The professional convention is to enumerate: each institution, each account number, and the specific statement periods you want behind it. A common lookback is 24 months, anchored to the filing date — or to the present, where the case calls for it.
The enumeration does two jobs. It makes the request impossible to misread, and it makes the response auditable: when the statements arrive, you can mark each period received and see exactly which ones didn't come.
Track requests in waves.
Number and name each discovery request, and record which items were in which request. This matters when you go back for a second round: a follow-up that repeats the first request verbatim reads as noise. One that lists exactly what remains outstanding — with account numbers and date ranges — reads as diligence, to opposing counsel and to the court.
The surviving gap list is your motion-to-compel exhibit in embryo.
As documents arrive, mark each item resolved against the original request that asked for it. What survives — the items requested, dated, and still not produced — is no longer a hunch about an incomplete production. It is a documented list, and documented lists are what motions to compel are made of.
The checklist, kept by software.
Everything above is bookkeeping — necessary, mechanical, and exactly the kind of work that decays under deadline pressure. Ordernize does it as a side effect of organizing the case file:
- Coverage computed per account: every statement period you hold, every period you don't
- Request language generated from 19 forensic-accounting templates — account numbers and date ranges included
- Every gap tracked Triage → Requested → Resolved, resolving automatically as documents arrive
- Per-wave Excel exports, so each follow-up request is its own artifact
More questions? See the FAQ — or head back to all resources.
Stop keeping the checklist by hand.
Schedule a demo and watch the gap list build itself from a real production — accounts, periods, and generated request language included.
Schedule a demo